Adult Social Care Glossary, v 0.6

Appointment of independent mental capacity advocates

5.—(1) No person may be appointed to act as an IMCA for the purposes of sections 37 to 39 of the Act, or regulations made by virtue of section 41 of the Act, unless—
(a) he is for the time being approved by a local authority on the grounds that he satisfies the appointment requirements, or
(b) he belongs to a class of persons which is for the time being approved by a local authority on the grounds that all persons in that class satisfy the appointment requirements.

(2) The appointment requirements, in relation to a person appointed to act as an IMCA, are that—
(a) he has appropriate experience or training or an appropriate combination of experience and training;
(b) he is a person of integrity and good character; and
(c) he is able to act independently of any person who instructs him.

(3) Before a determination is made in relation to any person for the purposes of paragraph (2)(b), there must be obtained in respect of that person—
(a) an enhanced criminal record certificate issued pursuant to section 113B of the Police Act 1997(7); or
(b) if the purpose for which the certificate is required is not one prescribed under subsection (2) of that section, a criminal record certificate issued pursuant to section 113A of that Act.

Functions of an independent mental capacity advocate

6.—(1) This regulation applies where an IMCA has been instructed by an authorised person to represent a person (“P”).

(2) “Authorised person” means a person who is required or enabled to instruct an IMCA under sections 37 to 39 of the Act or under regulations made by virtue of section 41of the Act.

(3) The IMCA must determine in all the circumstances how best to represent and support P.

(4) In particular, the IMCA must—
(a) verify that the instructions were issued by an authorised person;
(b) to the extent that it is practicable and appropriate to do so—
(i) interview P, and
(ii) examine the records relevant to P to which the IMCA has access under section 35(6) of the Act;
(c) to the extent that it is practicable and appropriate to do so, consult—
(i) persons engaged in providing care or treatment for P in a professional capacity or for remuneration, and
(ii) other persons who may be in a position to comment on P’s wishes, feelings, beliefs or values; and
(d) take all practicable steps to obtain such other information about P, or the act or decision that is proposed in relation to P, as the IMCA considers necessary.

(5) The IMCA must evaluate all the information he has obtained for the purpose of—
(a) ascertaining the extent of the support provided to P to enable him to participate in making any decision about the matter in relation to which the IMCA has been instructed;
(b) ascertaining what P’s wishes and feelings would be likely to be, and the beliefs and values that would be likely to influence P, if he had capacity in relation to the proposed act or decision;
(c) ascertaining what alternative courses of action are available in relation to P;
(d) where medical treatment is proposed for P, ascertaining whether he would be likely to benefit from a further medical opinion.

(6) The IMCA must prepare a report for the authorised person who instructed him.

(7) The IMCA may include in the report such submissions as he considers appropriate in relation to P and the act or decision which is proposed in relation to him.

Challenges to decisions affecting persons who lack capacity

7.—(1) This regulation applies where—
(a) an IMCA has been instructed to represent a person (“P”) in relation to any matter, and
(b) a decision affecting P (including a decision as to his capacity) is made in that matter.

(2) The IMCA has the same rights to challenge the decision as he would have if he were a person (other than an IMCA) engaged in caring for P or interested in his welfare.